By Sunday 
Could the Veteran QB Be the Answer for the Steelers?
The Pittsburgh Steelers enter another offseason with one big question looming: who will be their quarterback moving forward? With Russell Wilson and Justin Fields already in the mix, the team appears set under center. But what if a proven veteran like Matthew Stafford suddenly became available?
Rumors have swirled about the Los Angeles Rams potentially parting ways with Stafford, and if that happens, should Pittsburgh make a move? Let’s break down the potential benefits and risks of such a bold decision.
The Case for Stafford
At 37 years old, Stafford isn’t the quarterback he once was, but he still possesses one of the best arms in the league. His ability to push the ball downfield, read defenses, and execute under pressure remains a valuable asset.
The Rams went 10-6 with Stafford last season, a solid showing, though not spectacular. However, in the right system with a strong defense and running game—both of which Pittsburgh has—he could elevate the team beyond what Wilson or Fields might offer.
For comparison, the Steelers finished 10-7 in 2024, with a quarterback situation that was often inconsistent. If Stafford could provide steadier play, Pittsburgh might be able to push deeper into the postseason rather than endure yet another early exit.
The Concerns: Age, Cost, and Fit
The biggest issue is Stafford’s age. While still capable, he isn’t the same dominant passer who led the Rams to a Super Bowl victory just a few years ago. Injuries have also been a concern, and at his age, durability becomes a bigger risk.
Then there’s the financial aspect. Stafford’s contract includes a $23 million base salary for 2025 and $26 million for 2026, along with additional bonuses. While those numbers aren’t outrageous for a franchise quarterback, the Steelers would need to decide if he’s worth that kind of investment at this stage in his career.
Lastly, there’s the question of how he fits in Pittsburgh’s system. Arthur Smith is not Sean McVay, and the Steelers’ supporting cast, while talented, isn’t necessarily built the same way as the Rams’ offense. Would Stafford thrive in a new environment, or would he struggle to replicate his past success?
Should the Steelers Take the Risk?
Ultimately, if the Rams make Stafford available, it raises an important question: why? Teams don’t typically let go of franchise quarterbacks unless they see a decline or a transition in their long-term vision. The Steelers would need to weigh whether Stafford is a true upgrade over Wilson and Fields or just another short-term fix.
With Pittsburgh coming off yet another frustrating playoff collapse, a change at quarterback might seem tempting. But unless Stafford is viewed as a clear, significant improvement, the team might be better off focusing on stability and development rather than chasing a potential short-term answer.
The question remains: would Stafford truly make the Steelers a contender, or would he simply be another piece in their ongoing quarterback shuffle?